The Washington Post declared, the Saturdays reported that the Pentagon is in the ends of the ends in Chicago, as an illegal critic and immobination.
The newspaper has added the ministry of the flat, which includes many options, including at least a few members of September National Guard.
“Chicago is in Chaos, and probably correct this situation soon,” Trump, that belongs to the Republican party, he told the journalists. He criticized the mayor of the city, while continues to attack the cour of the Democratic Party.
“Pentagon” he said: in a statement to the left (Saturday):, you do not live in specification and is generated the partners of others of the federal age and individuals. “
In response to a comments request, the White House was contracting to refer to the Statement issued by Trump, Friday, in which it has announced that chat was in causo.
Democrat JP trip of Illinois, that includes Chicago’s city, saying in a statement that has not received any communication has not added that there is no emergency that requires the national guard or other military forces.
Added, “Donald Trump is to focused the crisis and the Deadline to serifies the seat seat to the sake of the suciotity of wounds.”
A pascused for the city mayor, Brandon Johnson, is yet to meet a comment request. Johnson said Friday the city concerned with the consequences of any unlawful implementation of the national guard forces.
Added: “The problem is linked to Trump approach is that is not coordinated, unfair, and wrong.” Has pointed that Chicago’s Assassins declined last year from 30 per cent, diminished drawers by 35 percent, and shooting accidents declined by 40 percent.
At the trump question, last week, passers repeats national guard forces to Washington, DC, which is one hundred miles.
Trump represents the US capital as a city in crime, although the righteous data has shown that violent criminent rates have registered the lowest level in the Washington.
To the June, Trump ordered 700 los of drecure of losses and $ 4,000 of a california governor’s opposition with the immigant.
0 Comments