Abbas Abdul Jassim, a Growth Probit, turned by the critical thoughts, to recommend critical criticism, and what is replacement and replacement. “
In this dialogue; We try to understand cash bounds post -cash, as a project that is based on a newly composed account that is contest, and the difference is in terms of theory and practice.
> The displaced displacement in your critical operator from critical operator “to a new field that has been termed” .. what is new field and what is the cause of this qualitative harassment?
– literary critical could not have the elements of force force and dynically the aim of life, and also aesthetic was necessary to move to a new field, that was called with “critical thought” to understand. He or herself vision problems and the world in the twentieth century with a wider horizon.
Also see the critical thinking is more relapse of the cognitive control and writing literary critical was indignant and their criticism was in belt.
> We’re reading new problems to you in the critical thinking about “inspection”, why did you open with a new “s) is opened with a new” post-captivation of descriptive descriptions and the normative approaches?
– Before the question, should be clear that since the extreme medium, a frame of curricula to the grip – if it is not a new problem involving many problems; He sack of criticizing – not hates not esolatal of academic commonation but she prefises it isolation of the amonic environment that criticism is in the world.
Is the Debate of the theory with reality; Critical thought turned toward the “transferring book transforming theory of the limit”, but post-shifted to form with life. Rinburu, on my way out of the prevailing thought of the format control, except to the apparent of adore., Which is the derripy a hand, and adopted the idea of specialized traffic. With a post -methodology vision.
> Maybe the first to the future of “the absencience of your you are you entering you to Ibn Khality in your event”
Ibn Khaldun has adopted the circular time that is completely inconsistent with the idea of time or the future size “to recycle this problem without solution.
> So; What is the interpretation of Scott Ibn Khaldun on the future?
– If al -Jabiri see Ibn Khaldun the future “was not a mere Scott, but I would rather speak”, then didn’t explain the reason? Ibn Khalun Missing the ability to talk, then be afraid to the defective future in the social disintegration and the political state, but what was afraid of? And which one?
So, the future wasn’t fucking of the leisure of utilet’s past that the past has been controlled the price of the price, was the exponition of the futrency that “alive of the past”?
So, Ibn Khalun Fear of the resubmission at this moment is friends with the disintegration of Islamic state “in the blink” in the blinm
> There is no doubt they look in
– When you look at the future, see the literature goes to the literature herself the oe pawns and the race tributor and form of race.
The literature has reached the query, it was no longer able to fasten with the new life and is the rest the point, and the zero point means the absence of literary races.
> Despite your sincerely indicating meta narratives which are entered in the critical lesson, make writing in the theory … which is the explanation for that?
– Mytha belongs to a concipation initial of the critical occurrence and happen and it happen and it is held and belonging to a scheduled survey of the sex Years. Is reached the grade of colloding, and grade reached and has the tender and the tender and a few types and the needs, and the need for the need for your structures that have shouted by the narrow structures prevailing.
> There are those who see you are “a critical of my problem in terms of knowledge” … How do we understand this problem in critical thought?
– The book “The culture of the literary crit” of the literary. The first book and I haven’t been sitting free from my self-esteemed, and have not been free from my self-esteem, and have not been free It’s not Mahmoud Amin Al -alam, Ghali Shukri, and France Intellectual AWDDUALI before they were the critics? DIFFERENT, I have influenced by Nietzsche ideas, and I can’t hide my bias to this problematic thinking.
It was enough that the writer is not controversy, and the difference in writing, in a different model, and for all that of that the difference of existing structures with new workspace.
Thus, “difference, and dryer is also good,” as a result of the challenge of the knowledge, so is the product of the context and intersection between “readiness”, based on, based on the beginning of life EXILE with life renewed.
Critical thought contradiction can be reduced with many troubles, including the problem of philosophy and that I have is is like that “the problem”, then “the problem”; A machine consisting of a glass tube that contains honey and small things, mate, from which color trembling that we should install in a color or other forms.
0 Comments